disnehotelcontract
02-13-2004, 02:40 PM
Today I posted this :
If the Contract at the Disneyland Hotel has NOT yet been approved...take a close look at Article 26 Step 1 and 2 of the Grievance Clause....that grievance procedure allows the employees to unilaterally proceed thru greivance to arbitration... this matter is currently the subject of a lawsuit in federal court ninth circuit court of appeals. Since the UNION is toothless and does exactly what Disney wants, employees must stand up for their rights and demand their "UNILATERAL" right given by the existing contract to proceed in grievances (ask 2 out of 3 employees about LOCAL 681's breach of their duty of fair representation and you'll soon see a pattern of non representation of grievances....COMMON PRACTICE) Pass this info on to the voters for this agreement and dont let the disney lawyers and the union lawyers remove the "UNILATERAL" clause from the proposed collective bargaining agreement---guess what ...they will try to SNEAK it our of there ...check em out and check it out PASS THIS ON TO THE workers...they will try to take it out of the contract secretly since it is only ONE OR TWO WORDS ....check it out
The question is...how can this information be distributed in an urgent timely manner to the workers at Disneyland Hotel or any others affected by the upcoming contract. The case is HANCOCK v WDW, H.E.R.E. ---- in the ninth circuit Court of appeals.
The threat remains that the workers will not have a clue that the lawyers removed the “unilateral” clause from ARTICLE 26 to proceed “unilaterally to arbitration” because the body of language is so large and it will not be missed from the CBA.... Can you stave off even more collusion in the bargaining process by Disney and HERE by informing potential CBA voters that this tactic MAY be applied and to check if it (UNILATERAL CLAUSE) has been or is removed... HERE has a fiduciary duty to the workers by federal law and is a breach of their duty of fair representation removing their unilateral right to proceed because they have 1) been sued for 22 Million dollars by us or 2) our lawsuit exposes the unilateral contract for employees and in collusion with Disney the UNION has illegally harvested unknowing third world workers and others denying them already bargained for rights....because as you can clearly see it would be cumbersome having all those poor workers running around with the right to move to arbitration “UNILATERALLY”.... First CHECK IT OUT ...Second: Please respond with ideas on how to distribute the information surgically to the employees ...this is an emergency ...workers are going to get even more ****ed OK
Take Care
If the Contract at the Disneyland Hotel has NOT yet been approved...take a close look at Article 26 Step 1 and 2 of the Grievance Clause....that grievance procedure allows the employees to unilaterally proceed thru greivance to arbitration... this matter is currently the subject of a lawsuit in federal court ninth circuit court of appeals. Since the UNION is toothless and does exactly what Disney wants, employees must stand up for their rights and demand their "UNILATERAL" right given by the existing contract to proceed in grievances (ask 2 out of 3 employees about LOCAL 681's breach of their duty of fair representation and you'll soon see a pattern of non representation of grievances....COMMON PRACTICE) Pass this info on to the voters for this agreement and dont let the disney lawyers and the union lawyers remove the "UNILATERAL" clause from the proposed collective bargaining agreement---guess what ...they will try to SNEAK it our of there ...check em out and check it out PASS THIS ON TO THE workers...they will try to take it out of the contract secretly since it is only ONE OR TWO WORDS ....check it out
The question is...how can this information be distributed in an urgent timely manner to the workers at Disneyland Hotel or any others affected by the upcoming contract. The case is HANCOCK v WDW, H.E.R.E. ---- in the ninth circuit Court of appeals.
The threat remains that the workers will not have a clue that the lawyers removed the “unilateral” clause from ARTICLE 26 to proceed “unilaterally to arbitration” because the body of language is so large and it will not be missed from the CBA.... Can you stave off even more collusion in the bargaining process by Disney and HERE by informing potential CBA voters that this tactic MAY be applied and to check if it (UNILATERAL CLAUSE) has been or is removed... HERE has a fiduciary duty to the workers by federal law and is a breach of their duty of fair representation removing their unilateral right to proceed because they have 1) been sued for 22 Million dollars by us or 2) our lawsuit exposes the unilateral contract for employees and in collusion with Disney the UNION has illegally harvested unknowing third world workers and others denying them already bargained for rights....because as you can clearly see it would be cumbersome having all those poor workers running around with the right to move to arbitration “UNILATERALLY”.... First CHECK IT OUT ...Second: Please respond with ideas on how to distribute the information surgically to the employees ...this is an emergency ...workers are going to get even more ****ed OK
Take Care