Quantcast Tokyo Disneysea - DO NOT BE DUPED!
  Articles | Disneyland | Walt Disney World | User Reviews | Travel
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 26

Thread: Tokyo Disneysea - DO NOT BE DUPED!

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio

    Tokyo Disneysea - DO NOT BE DUPED!

    Had to write this after reading Ted's Journey article.

    Disneysea is a beautiful park. It is a joy to walk through. All the stuff you have heard about attention to detail in the environmental design is right-on. What's more, it has a delicious sense of elevation changes--the ascent to Mt. Prometheus alone is marvelous, through an Italian vineyard, past ancient ruins, into a forest of rock so massive and enveloping and delicately worked that the experience grabs you by the heart.

    I tell my buddies who haven't been to TDS that it's the first park built in "widescreen." I liken it to my initial visit to Animal Kingdom, the first time I experienced the vista toward the Tree of Life, how big and vast and new and rich the thing felt. Well ALL of TDS feels like this, all over!

    But anyone who tries to sell you on the notion that the attractions at TDS are up to snuff with the environs is doing you a disservice. This is certainly true with Journey to the Center of the Earth.

    Now, I am a huge fan of Disney's 20k Leagues film, so I was delighted in Mysterious Island, seeing a framed image of James Mason, walking past all these devices and structures you never saw in the film but felt right on the money. The queue for this attraction and the 20k attraction are alive with this stuff. Like on Indy in DL, I was happy to wait in line (not typical).

    But you get on this attraction and it all falls apart. The sets are too-few and not the same level as the built environments you wander through at TDS. Ted mentions the mural (in the scene where "everything goes wrong") that is meant to convey a continuing tunnel but in application is unconvincing. This is maybe the worst of it, but each set carries at least some measure of that type of hokeum, and the black light just cheeses things up further. Matters are made worse by poor staging, at times revealing the next set before the guest is meant to see it.

    The "Journey" itself is meant to feel winding, with unexpected turns and surprises, a sense that things can happen here. But of course, the inflexible ride system betrays this intention. The whole thing feels as spontaneous as Test Track, nothing like the improvisational flavor of DL's Indy.

    Finally, the two big set pieces--the Lava Monster and the "escape"--are underwhelming.

    This Lava creature is--to my eye--a Carnotaurus from Countdown to Extinction (sorry but I will always use this attraction's original name--cooler), redressed to look like the second cousin of the Alien Encounter monster. Maybe it's just that I heard the thing was huge and cool-looking, don't know, but it came off as rather puny, rather derivative. Not at all in scale with this BIG park's signature experience.

    And the escape? Well, keep in mind that this ride platform is essentially Rocket Rods (though on a much better track as Ted points out). The thrill here is going fast-ish up hill (in the dark), down a meager drop, and then fast again around a curve. Very short and very tame. Like the AA, it felt out of scale with what this attraction represents in a park that professes a heavy lean toward adventure.

    Now, I don't speak Japanese, so I know I'm handicapped a bit here, I know I didn't "get" everything, but I am not talking about whether this attraction made sense, I am talking about the visceral experience, that which transcends language and speaks to your senses, to your gut.

    In my gut, this attraction is far from a "home run." It is barely 3 stars in my opinion, helped primarily by the queue's momentary sating of my Nemo-fetish. It is Rocket Rods in a thematic environment, winding past lackluster sets, climaxing with a Carnotaurus attack and the run-out from Test Track.

    When I have voiced my opinion on TDS's attractions (because Journey is not the only ride that falls flat) I have been accused of not liking TDS. That is bunk, I LOVE TDS. But I have to tell you that I was disappointed after seeing many of the attractions, having heard all the reviews that just gush profusely.

    TDS is wonderful. Kudos to WDI and OLC for an original mix of attractions. Hats off for a stable of great shows, environments that will knock you out, an amazing variety of merchandise, and food like you won't believe. And there are good attractions too--just not a full roster of great attractions.

    You go to TDS, I promise you'll love it. Just keep in mind that not everything is as glitters as you've been told. If you choose to believe the hype about these attractions, you're being cheated. Your expectations for the rides will be like mine, out of whack with what they really are, and you'll no doubt feel pangs of disappointment.


  2. # ADS

    Join Date
    Location
    Posts
     

  3. #2
    Walt Disney Studios
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    United Kingdom

    Interesting


  4. #3
    Luvr of all things Disney
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Long Island, NY

    I have not been there but after reading the review from Ted and seeing the photos and even the video footage of the Lava Monster on laughingplace.com I, too, thought it all seemed very familiar --- again Countdown to Extinction-ish --- so I can understand what you may be saying --- that while the park is quite beautiful and definitely worth going to --- there's nothing there we haven't really seen before.

    There may be 3 Lands,
    but there is only 1 World!!!

  5. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles

    Alanzo,

    I have to admit a bit of a letdown myself when I rode it (see my trip report). But I think it is a better ride than you make it out to be.

    There are a lot of Disney rides that belie their dark-ride roots, not the least of which is countdown to extintion, which is more black velvet than actual theming.

    By contrast, Journey has theming and animatronics in spades. The lava monster is not a carnataurous, it is a completely different and larger animatronic (the largest one ever built).

    Yes, I think the story could be stronger and the environments could have been larger and more impressive. Here we get into the greatness of Indiana Jones and it's wonderful Cavern of Bubbling Death as establishing shot. To me, no Disney ride has topped that moment of realization, and none will probably for years to come.

    But some of the thrills are undenyable, including the perfect parabolic arc of the escape from the volcano. I had more weightless time on that one ride than on any Disney ride to date, and for roller-coaster fans that is a well-tuned and designed experience.


    You know, the volcano itself is so beautiful, it's okay to me that the ride isn't as great.... it's just such a magical moment to be riding in THAT VOLCANO. Hard to put into words, but it's like the magic I felt when seeing Space Mountain for the first time across 7 Sea's Lagoon, or Spaceship Earth from my hotel window. I had to ride WHATEVER was in those buildings, and they were greater than those rides would be if they were in any other structure.

    -Kuzcotopia

    -Kuzcotopia

    Mission To Mars, Skyway to Fantasyland, CircleVision, Submarine Voyage, Rocket Rods, Space Mountain...
    Tomorrowland only has 4 rides! In 1967 it had 9! People, we're going in the wrong direction.
    "DO SOMETHING ABOUT TOMORROWLAND!"

  6. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio

    Kuzco-

    I am not in a place where I will deny the value of JtCotE. It's certainly there, in it's Nemo roots, in the sense of exploration established in the queue, in the details throughout--even in the parallels between this and earlier dark ride "tours" (Rainbow Caverns comes to mind). I will not say it's a bad ride.

    However, I'll make two points here, both of which I hope you'll appreciate:

    1). From the inception of Disneyland, visiting Disney attractions has been likened to a cinematic experience. There are establishing shots that introduce scenes, characters. From this platform, conflicts are introduced, stories are told, all building to a big climax.

    In the case of Journey, this whole sense of "build" is incredible. Guests move from this wonderful vista (view of Mt Prometheus across Port Paradiso), into a dark tunnel of intrigue, through marvelous reveals within the queue. The whole thing builds and builds and builds and the anticipation is tangible and maddening.

    But, whereas one would expect a most spectacular and adventurous experience, climaxing in a thrilling finale, we get an animatronic that is well-separated from guests and (what I contend is) a mediocre little drop that has nothing on Disney's greatest thrill finale--Tower of Terror.

    The whole thing peters out too quickly and is not in scale with the vastness and drama and subtlety of Mysterious Island. The idea that this just-okay ride is somehow made better because it is in Mt. Prometheus is akin to saying that Phantom Menace is a better movie because it's falls under the Star Wars banner. For me, that very context makes me expect more. In this case, less is delivered.

    2.) More importantly, I would not feel so compelled to be writing as critically about this attraction if it weren't for the ranks of TDS visitors who continue to build up expectations for this park. Absolutely, the place is gorgeous and rich and imaginative; it's light-years beyond DCA or DAK or (from what I can see) WDS. And this is what people see in the breathtaking images of tha park that have been released.

    But consider the folks who either will never make it to Tokyo, or those who will save for the next half-decade to get there. Reviewers that insist on saying things like Journey is a home-run are quite frankly setting these folks up by alligning the quality of the attractions (which folks have seen very little of) with the quality of the enviromental design (which folks see in every review).

    Consider the former group--those folks who will never see TDS. Such reviews only maintain this notion that Disney is employing a unilateral policy of creating entirely "bad parks" with their own money and entirely "outstanding parks" with other people's money.

    Worse yet, consider the latter group--those who scrimp pennies for years to get to TDS. These folks are almost guaranteed to be disappointed once they experience TDS's attractions first-hand. Think about it, you read for years that they've hit one over the fences with this ride, baby. Imagine how deflated you'd be once you finally got on this thing. Heck, I heard the hype on this thing for only a few months before I visited and I can tell you I was let down.

    All I am asking for here is some balance. Frankly, I am amazed that Mouseplanet--a source that I've never seen pull punches with Disney in the past--has only carried these unilaterally pro-TDS reviews. I would have expected a more objective analysis of such a heralded new Disney park from Mouseplanet by now.

    (BTW - do you have any specs on the Lava Monster AA? I haven't seen anything, other than Disney's own press release about the figure, which I take with a grain of salt. I'm trying to get a sense of how much larger this figure is than any previous audio-animatronic. Appreciate anything you provide).


  7. #6
    PI Aficionado
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Redondo Beach, CA

    A suspicious person might think that the reason TDS is universally praised here at MousePlanet is because

    - Most MousePlanet readers will never see it, therefore

    - The "authorities" can say whatever they want about it without fear of being corrected and

    - This can bolster their premise that OLC is perfect and Disney, left on their own, now stinks.

    Any negative stories or even opinions about the new Japan park would weaken that case. Just think how much shorter all the DIG updates would be without the theming and quality comparisons of DCA to TDS!

    Rocket Scientist/Future Imagineer
    "The best way to predict the future is to invent it.", Alan Kay
    Come join the Pleasure Island Lover's Club!

  8. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA

    hey~
    am i sensing a little negativity towards OLC and TDS???

    "But we won't throw any piece of junk at the public and try to sell 'em.
    We fight for quality." - Walt Disney

  9. #8
    PI Aficionado
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Redondo Beach, CA

    I'm just trying to keep an open mind before my visit next month. I loved TDL five years ago, just as I have enjoyed every Disney park.

    The first time I went to Disneyland I was afraid I was going to hate it because I'd been going to WDW for years and thought of DL as the old, worn-down west coast Magic Kingdom. I was so pleasantly surprised! I heard all kinds of bad things about DCA before I went, but my wife and I loved it! The same goes for Disney movies--whenever I hear how bad a new feature is, it usually means I'm going to enjoy it (Hunchback and Atlantis come to mind). So the key to me is just to keep an open mind until I see something for myself and then enjoy it for what it is.

    Rocket Scientist/Future Imagineer
    "The best way to predict the future is to invent it.", Alan Kay
    Come join the Pleasure Island Lover's Club!

  10. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio

    No negativity here, either. I couldn't be more fond of OLC for being part of this stellar park (and resort).

    My only beef is with folks who purport TDS to be something more than it actually is. I'm not sure if they are gloating because they've been to this new, very far away park, and most haven't, or, if they are truly blind to the problems this park has (and it does have some).

    Regardless, these folks are painting a portrait of a park that just doesn't exist.

    Celebrate what the park does well, I say, but don't sell it as something it's not.


  11. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA

    Good to hear! =)

    I myself haven't been to TDS yet but am looking forward to seeing it this summer!

    Sometimes I think that when people hype something up you kinda go in there with the mindset that's its gonna be great and become blind to the problems it may have... which isn't good in some ways..

    my one friend insists that TDS is too small and was too crowded for her to enjoy when she went... but I'll have to see it for myself!!!!

    I think people tend to hype up TDS because they look at DCA... DCA isn't a BAD park.. there are some things about the park that I really like... it's just depressing to hear about all the stuff that Imagineers may have/could have done if given the proper financial backing... and in TDS' case, I think they were able to do alot of what their creative minds designed because they had OLC to rely on for money.... and it's just depressing to see how money gets in the way of good design/theming and creativity...

    It's the same with IOA too.. people say that that park is great... and I personally loved the design and the rides.... but I'm sure there are lots of things about that park that are problematic as well.....


    I really do hope lots of people get the chance to see TDL and TDS!

    "But we won't throw any piece of junk at the public and try to sell 'em.
    We fight for quality." - Walt Disney

  12. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio

    I'm certain you'll love TDS...I liked it (and the whole TDR) so much that I am going back in July. Can't wait...they should have FastPass up & running for a few more attractions.

    Not sure I would agree with your pal that TDS is too small. I would suggest that it has issues with attraction distribution through the park. There are some areas where stuff feels too clustered, others where there's almost nothing for yards and yards and yards. Creates some weird traffic patterns that maybe will be solved as build-out occurs.

    I think the whole money-isssue that everyone carps on (both in regard to TDS and DCA) is way-overplayed. I have seen a great deal done with very little in resources and by the same token a lot of money spent on real dogs. If anything TDS proves that money isn't teh only ingredient necessary in building a quality experience and that, yes, Imagineers are fallible.

    Here's hoping TDS starts to be measured on an even playing field (and DCA, too).


  13. #12
    PI Aficionado
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Redondo Beach, CA

    I have to agree that too much attention is paid to the reputed budgets of each park. What is certainly more important is the support (or lack thereof) from upper management for creative ideas from Imagineering. The cost of each park COULD be an indidcation of that, if in Tokyo expensive projects were given the green light in the interest of a quality guest experience while at DCA cost-cutting eliminated a lot of that. I have zero insight into that process, though, so I can't comment one way or the other, and I don't trust all the hearsay that floats around these internet boards.

    Rocket Scientist/Future Imagineer
    "The best way to predict the future is to invent it.", Alan Kay
    Come join the Pleasure Island Lover's Club!

  14. #13
    Less angry than advertised
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    location location

    It's good to finally hear some constructive criticism from an objective viewpoint. I agree with Iceman's general line of reasoning. I believe people want a reason to be incensed about DCA. By holding to the image the TDS is flawless, it gives them reason to gripe. If we make ourselves out to be victims of favoritism, we have every right to complain louder. Finding out that, while there are clearly many aspects in which TDS far exceeds the quality at DCA, there are also aspects that belie the fact that is was built (in part) by the same company means that DCA is not the neglected child many people would like to believe it is.

    Of course, none of that excuses Disney from substandard attractions, in Anaheim or Tokyo. But it's nice to see a slightly more realistic view of what's going on.


  15. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA

    Not to say at all that Japanese companies aren't looking to make a profit, but from my perspective it seems like Japanese companies, overall - not just Disney - understand that to have a good product, it has to be of good quality. (unlike some companies that try to see how much they can lower the quality and still raise the prices)

    Sure, Tokyo Disneyland doesn't have much competition in terms of theme parks in Japan (unlike Anaheim where Knotts, Universal.. Magic Mountain compete for against DL for customers)... but they still understand that if they're going to build a new park, they need to come out with a park that is like no other.....

    I've read books that talk about how OLC and how their company operates and how fascinating it is that a Japanese company can take an American product and mold it into something that is somewhat more Japanese.... I've read that OLC does such a good job because they understand the dreams and the concepts behind DIsney theme parks that Walt Disney had, and that OLC does everything it can to try to protect the integrity of Walt's dreams....

    and the fact that Japanese people expect a lot out of Disney forces OLC to try to make something that will rise to the expectations of the mass or else the park will fail.....

    people in Japan still seem to prefer TDL over TDS... when I went for christmas, i heard that TDL was long sold out but TDS tickets were still available... hrmm...

    "But we won't throw any piece of junk at the public and try to sell 'em.
    We fight for quality." - Walt Disney

  16. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Originally posted by LuvTDL


    Sure, Tokyo Disneyland doesn't have much competition in terms of theme parks in Japan (unlike Anaheim where Knotts, Universal.. Magic Mountain compete for against DL for customers)..

    Woah.

    That's totally not the case. Japanese LOVE their theme parks and have many many per square mile more than we do.

    They have Disneyland and Universal Osaka and TONS of other theme parks like Festival Gate, Takarazuka, Expotown, Fujikyu Highland, Nagashima Spa Land, Space World and the list goes on and on....


    Yeah, probably over christmas Disneyland was packed with families with kids. Disneyland is the sentimental choice for the holidays.
    -Kuzcotopia

    Mission To Mars, Skyway to Fantasyland, CircleVision, Submarine Voyage, Rocket Rods, Space Mountain...
    Tomorrowland only has 4 rides! In 1967 it had 9! People, we're going in the wrong direction.
    "DO SOMETHING ABOUT TOMORROWLAND!"

  17. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA

    oops... i should have explained what I meant a little more...

    sorry - i didn't mean to say that TDL has absolutely no competition... i understand that other parks - especially Universal Osaka is a big competitor if you look at the whole of Japan... but Osaka is pretty far from TDL... and other parks like Fujikyu Highland, in my mind, can't be considered a THEME PARK... I think of it more as an amusement park (thus the Japanese word - yu en chi)... for example, people dont' go there to interact with characters, they go to ride the extreme rides.... and some parks that consider themselves "theme parks" in Japan, are really poorly done and often cannot be put at the same level as TDL....and some parks that tried to incorporate themes into their parks never did as well as TDL did (eg: Canadian World in Hokkaido, PuroLand, the Spanish themed one...etc)

    (oops... magic mountain, in my opinion, isn't really a theme park either.. sorry)

    oh well... that's totally off the subject of the original post!!

    just wanted to clarify what I said =)

    "But we won't throw any piece of junk at the public and try to sell 'em.
    We fight for quality." - Walt Disney

  18. #17

    Interesting. Someone (?) wrote almost exactly the same post on Laughing Place a few weeks or perhaps months ago. The poster accused us of deceiving the public. They had never posted before or after, so I assumed they were just a troll.


  19. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles

    Yeah, the standard Mouseplanet gripe is that DCA sucks and TDS rules.

    Yet Al Lutz and much of the people writing that have never been to both. (I have).


    TDS is on a much grander scale than California Adventure, or even Disneyland itself. It would fit in with Florida parks like Epcot or Animal Kingdom.

    So comparing it to California Adventure is crazy. The things in California cannot be the size and scope of the Florida parks. Instead, it should be focused to create a gem of a park, the way that the original Disneyland is.

    Disneyland is my favorite park of all of the ones in the world, because it is a gem.

    Is DCA a gem, is a better question than does it stack up to DisneySea.


    I don't think it is, but that's the more pertinent question.

    I think that DisneySea would fit in well among the Florida parks, and I would love them to build it there.

    If DisneySea were in Florida, it would still rank 3rd in my list of favorite Florida Disney parks. Epcot, Animal Kingdom then DisneySea. (I don't visit Magic Kingdom, since I prefer Disneyland).

    So DisneySea is VERY much, in my opinion, AT the level of the other American offerings, besides DCA.

    There is a lot of magic in DisneySea. Perhaps more than Animal Kingdom, but perhaps not...

    I am a big fan of Animal Kingdom, so I may be a little off of the general opinion of that park. I know people dump on it as a half day park.

    -Kuzcotopia

    Mission To Mars, Skyway to Fantasyland, CircleVision, Submarine Voyage, Rocket Rods, Space Mountain...
    Tomorrowland only has 4 rides! In 1967 it had 9! People, we're going in the wrong direction.
    "DO SOMETHING ABOUT TOMORROWLAND!"

  20. #19

    Iceman: I think many of us will be waiting to hear your "take" on the TDS attractions such as JTTCOTE, 20K Leagues, Stormrider, et. al ....... Over time I have found your observations to be insightful and informative (as I have found the comments of Kuzcotopia as well) and I look forward to see how you view these attractions as opposed to Kuz ...........

    Kuz: Did your comments include the 20,000 Leagues attraction specifically or was it simply by implication that that attraction, as well as JTTCOTE, was not a good as you had hoped?


  21. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles

    In my trip report I gave a review of 20,000 leagues under the sea.

    I put it in the area of general Dark Ride. Not an E-ticket in the modern thrill-ride sense of the term. To me, Leagues is a D, as I would place Alice in Wonderland or Casey Junior.

    -Kuzcotopia

    Mission To Mars, Skyway to Fantasyland, CircleVision, Submarine Voyage, Rocket Rods, Space Mountain...
    Tomorrowland only has 4 rides! In 1967 it had 9! People, we're going in the wrong direction.
    "DO SOMETHING ABOUT TOMORROWLAND!"

  22. #21

    What a well written article. I hope that one day I can go there, even if it were just to take in scenery.


  23. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Los Angeleeeez
    (BTW - do you have any specs on the Lava Monster AA? I haven't seen anything, other than Disney's own press release about the figure, which I take with a grain of salt. I'm trying to get a sense of how much larger this figure is than any previous audio-animatronic. Appreciate anything you provide).
    From what I've heard, the lava monster measures up at about twenty, twenty-two feet, and tips the scales at eight or nine thousand pounds. While this is a very large animatronic, and one of the largest ever built for a theme park attraction, it is not THE biggest.

    Awhile back, I studied up on all the specs of Universal Orlando's rides when it first opened. The King Kong ride has two animatronic Kongs that you encounter, and both are larger than the lava monster at TDS, although there has been some debate about one of the Kongs qualifying as an animatronic. The first kong is hanging from a bridge, and is a full-body representation of the ape. The debate on this Kong stems from the fact that his legs and one of his arms are bolted down, giving the appearance that he's hanging from the bridge. Essentially, only his head and his other arm are fully-articulated, making some people declare that he's not much more than an oversized puppet. Personally, I think that if it's mechanical, and it moves, it should qualify as an animatronic.

    The second Kong is a 3/4 body representation, with his "legs" being hidden by a construction trailer. This Kong has full torso sway, with both arms and head being fully-articulated, which definitely qualifies it as an animatronic. This Kong is about 32 1/2 feet tall, and weighs nearly thirteen thousand pounds.

    So there you go. Kong wins the battle of the bulge. I'm sure the Disney spin-doctors were the ones responsible for the "lava monster being the biggest" claim, but they would be incorrect in their contention.

    Hope that helps.

    -BJM
    Lalalalalalala........lalalala......I mean, what?

  24. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles

    Since Audio-Animatronic is a trademark of the Disney Company, perhaps only Disney creatures count.

    This may be the biggest Audio-Animatronic (tm), not to say that Kong isn't bigger, it's just that Universal needs to get their own word!

    -Kuzcotopia

    Mission To Mars, Skyway to Fantasyland, CircleVision, Submarine Voyage, Rocket Rods, Space Mountain...
    Tomorrowland only has 4 rides! In 1967 it had 9! People, we're going in the wrong direction.
    "DO SOMETHING ABOUT TOMORROWLAND!"

  25. #24
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio

    Yeah...I'm sure Kuzco is right about this. "Animatronic" is a generic term, but slap "Audio-" in front and it's Disney's game alone.

    Universal is pretty loose with what they deem animatronics anyway, and what they consider "biggest." I remember the spin doctors at Universal Studios Orlando purported that the bug in MIB was the largest animatronic ever. I think maybe it has four moves. Heck there are billboards on the Beeline that have more points of articulation.

    Of course, this brings into question the giant Ursula figure in the Mermaid Theater. Clearly, the head itself is much smaller than the Lava Monster...but where do you stop counting??? Behind the scenes, there is a gigantic boom system so big that the side of the building needed to be blow out to install the figure. This count?

    ...And, if it does, I wonder if this figure would be in the running anyway. Since it was built by a third-party contractor (not WDI), can it truly claim to be a "real" Audio-Animatronic?


  26. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Los Angeleeeez
    This may be the biggest Audio-Animatronic (tm), not to say that Kong isn't bigger, it's just that Universal needs to get their own word!
    Actually, Universal does have their own word, stupid as it may be. They term all their animatronic creations "Cinebots," and the art of making them "Cinebotics." Generic, I know, but what're you gonna do.

    Kong does indeed qualify as an animatronic though, there's not much room for interpretation there. His two arms have full range of motion, including twisting wrists and articulated fingers. His face is fully articulated, down to lip action, and his neck and entire upper body are articulated as well. So I'd say he pretty much fits the bill. And seeing as how he's thirty-plus feet tall, I think he wins the prize.

    As far as Ursula, I'm not sure. With the whole "boom" mechanism, it sounds like nothing more than a more complicated version of the dragon in Fantasmic at DL, which also operates by boom. Ursula sounds more like a giant puppet, with a face that happens to be articulated.
    Lalalalalalala........lalalala......I mean, what?

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •