Quantcast Academy Award Nominations
  Articles | Disneyland | Walt Disney World | User Reviews | Travel
Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Academy Award Nominations

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Bradenton, Fl

    Academy Award Nominations

    They were announced this morning. Didn't seem to be any surprises that I noticed. Here's the complete rundown if you missed it: http://www.oscars.org/77academyawards/noms.html

    Anything you think did desreve a nod but didn't get one? Anyone who doesn't deserve to be on the list? Who will win vs. who should win?

    Discuss!


  2. # ADS

    Join Date
    Location
    Posts
     

  3. #2
    It's "we"! Not "I"!
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ranting and raving
    Quote Originally Posted by XHarryB
    Anything you think did desreve a nod but didn't get one?
    You all know what I think about this.

    I am ticked. Not surprised, but ticked nonetheless.
    Why, Sam Raimi?! Why did you have to butcher Venom?!

  4. #3
    Newsletter Editor
    MousePad Moderator
    MousePad Administrator
    MousePad Community Leader
    stan4d_steph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    NY Capital Region
    Blog Entries
    38

    One article I read at CNN.com indicated that "Sideways" actor Paul Giamatti was expected to get a nomination. I haven't seen it so I can't comment on that. I did see A Very Long Engagement, and LOVED it. It was only nominated for Art Direction. I think there was some big hoohah in France that it was an "American" film since it was financed by a division of WB, so they didn't put it up for foreign film, which is a shame.


  5. #4

    As I size up the body politic known as the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences right now...

    Jamie Foxx's extraordinary work in "Ray" will be recognized. They will recognize it by giving him an Oscar (r) for "Collateral." Thomas Haden Church however, is stiff competition.

    It should, finally, be Scorsese's year. But the academy is topheavy with voting members in the performing arts and they tend to honor their own when given the chance, (Why else would Mel Gibson have been awarded an Oscar for directing?) thus Eastwood becomes a contender. (I'm not saying that he doesn't do a good job...) And my gut instinct says not to count out Taylor Hackford but that's a hunch. I admit, I never saw Polanski's Oscar coming...

    IF Jamie Foxx takes the award for support, I'm leaning toward Johnny Depp. DiCaprio seems to rub the Academy the wrong way and there's also the idea that his good work occurs when Scorsese is at the helm. In a perfect world it would go to Don Cheadle.

    Without Randy Newman the music is ordinary, hoping John Williams does not back into another one.

    Best Actress in a Supporting Role looks like a crapshoot...all good, all deserving. I'm leaning towards Annette Benning for lead, but the word of mouth is strong for Catalina Sandino Moreno...haven't seen it or her though.

    All of this is, however, subject to change once the dust settles.

    -TLMt


  6. #5
    Stuffed with Fluff 3894's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Winter Wonderland
    Blog Entries
    3

    If Jamie Foxx takes the supporting actor, it's Don Cheadle for "Hotel Rwanda" all the way.

    Insert passive aggressive sentence of your choice here.

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by 3894
    If Jamie Foxx takes the supporting actor, it's Don Cheadle for "Hotel Rwanda" all the way.
    To paraphrase Little tod, who puts forth this wise question about the best picture catagory...who gave the best performance, or who will they pick? There's a reason I usually refer to the Academy as "the body politic."

    -TLMt

  8. #7
    Newsletter Editor
    MousePad Moderator
    MousePad Administrator
    MousePad Community Leader
    stan4d_steph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    NY Capital Region
    Blog Entries
    38

    Forgot to add: Hooray for Brad Bird's nom. for oringial screenplay (The Incredibles)! He's probably a long shot to get it, but ya nevah know.


  9. #8
    blue squadron
    MousePad Subscriber
    cstephens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    insignificant blue green planet
    Blog Entries
    1

    I'm glad Virginia Madsen and Laura Linney were nominated. They were both excellent. While I thought Thomas Hayden Church was good, I don't exactly understand all the hoopla or the nomination. I wish Paul Giamatti had been nominated, but maybe Best Actor had stiffer competition than Best Supporting Actor. I also wish Liam Neeson had been nominated because he was excellent, but not enough buzz for the movie.

    Now I have to decide what films to see because of nominations. I think "The Aviator" falls into the "I should see it because of the nominations but I don't know if I can convince myself to go" category.

    The viper is flown from the seated position.
    Good thing, too.
    blah blah blah blah

  10. #9
    Gettin' Holiday Ready TikiGeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Between Las Vegas and the Grand Canyon

    What do you guys think

    The Incredibles or Shrek 2 for best animated feature film of the year??? That's a tough one. Pixar usually cleans up but Shrek 2 was pretty good.

    Super Size Me has to get it for best Documentary.
    “Quality is a great business plan.”
    ~John Lasseter

  11. #10
    average dude
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    In an American Land

    i think The Incredibles was by far the superior picture. the story line and the action were unique, while Shrek 2 was just a predictable satire in the format of the first Shrek. it was enjoyable, but it's overall quality was nowhere near The Incredibles.

    "it all started from a Daddy with two daughters, wondering where he could take them where he could have a little fun with them too." -- Walt Disney
    "This is my family. I found it, all on my own. It's little, and broken, but still good. Yeah, still good." -- Stitch

  12. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Bradenton, Fl

    I think the only sure thing really is jamie Foxx for Ray. Which of course makes it that much more likely that he won't win. if he doesn't though, it will definitely be one of the biggest shockers of the night.

    I can't believe Phantom didn't get a costume nod.

    As much as I enjoyed Shrek 2 as a film, if it beats Incredibles I swear I'll be throwing things at my TV.

    When it comes to the females, I think it's pretty much wide open. All the buzz is about the rematch between Anette Benning and Hilary Swank (they were also both nominated the year Hilary won for Boys Don't Cry). Again, in my mind this means neither will win.


  13. #12
    From another lifetime
    MousePlanet Staff
    lisap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Sweet and spicy

    Is it just me, or do all the best picture nominees seem to be on pretty even footing--buzzwise? I don't see any that are total shoe-ins at this point. I have only seen Finding Neverland and the Aviator--I need to start catching up before I give my predictions.


  14. #13
    That's Dr. Earkid to you ;)
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Not a shiney person, BUT I AM GOLD!!!!!
    Quote Originally Posted by The Lovely Mrs. tod
    To paraphrase Little tod, who puts forth this wise question about the best picture catagory...who gave the best performance, or who will they pick? There's a reason I usually refer to the Academy as "the body politic."
    Exactly why I don't watch!

    It's like having only the Disney big wigs decide what is a good ride and what isn't. Commonly doesn't jive with the general public/fans think. So what's the point of the entire hoopla?

    The only reason I may watch this year is because it has been announced that Orlando Bloom is a presenter. After my two mintues of drooling the channel will change.

  15. #14
    Clive Owen in Closer (Sony Pictures Releasing)
    Insert dreamy sigh here...

    Quote Originally Posted by The Lovely Mrs. tod
    Jamie Foxx's extraordinary work in "Ray" will be recognized. They will recognize it by giving him an Oscar (r) for "Collateral." Thomas Haden Church however, is stiff competition.
    I agree with this 100%

  16. #15
    At Walt's in Disneyland Paris DisneylandForever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    SF, CA
    Quote Originally Posted by disney jones
    i think The Incredibles was by far the superior picture. the story line and the action were unique, while Shrek 2 was just a predictable satire in the format of the first Shrek. it was enjoyable, but it's overall quality was nowhere near The Incredibles.
    Agree with this. The Incredibles was funny and original. The Shrek films remind me of a CG version of SNL. They take stuff that is already in existence and just make fun of it. Pinocchio wearing a thong? Not funny.

  17. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Torring, Denmark

    I heard on the German radio last evening that Der Untergang was nominated for best foreign pic, so I hope for it, or the Swedish movie to win.
    Go Incredibles!


  18. #17

    I'm a little surprise by...

    1) Paul Giamatti not getting a nomination.
    2) Michael Moore not getting a nomination (when there was so much broohaha over his documentary).
    3) Passion of the Christ can't (and didn't) receive a Foreign Language nomination because it was spoken in a dead language and thus disqualifying it as a potentail qualifier.
    4) Jim Carrey was not nominated, but Kate Winslet was. (re: Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind)
    5) Yah! A second chance for Johnny to get an Oscar!!

    I have a stressful job.
    But I love it.

  19. #18
    average dude
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    In an American Land
    Quote Originally Posted by The Lovely Mrs. tod
    To paraphrase Little tod, who puts forth this wise question about the best picture catagory...who gave the best performance, or who will they pick? There's a reason I usually refer to the Academy as "the body politic." -TLMt
    To be sure, i feel that would capture the Academy, but i much prefer this awards show than something like the People's Choice Awards, which panders to the lowest common denominator and is a popularity contest, not really judging something on artistic merits. Even if politics sometimes get in the way, at least AMPAS is offering a judgment of their professional peers.
    "it all started from a Daddy with two daughters, wondering where he could take them where he could have a little fun with them too." -- Walt Disney
    "This is my family. I found it, all on my own. It's little, and broken, but still good. Yeah, still good." -- Stitch

  20. #19
    ARG's Dad
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    That worked!
    Quote Originally Posted by sdfilmcritic
    2) Michael Moore not getting a nomination (when there was so much broohaha over his documentary).
    Moore decided not to submit the film for consideration in the Best Documentary
    Feature category, instead choosing to focus on promoting the film for a Best Picture nomination. I suspect it would have gotten a Best Documentary nomination, but the film was definitely yesterday's news by the time the nominating ballots went out so I'm not surprised at all that it was ignored in the major categories.

    3) Passion of the Christ can't (and didn't) receive a Foreign Language nomination because it was spoken in a dead language and thus disqualifying it as a potentail qualifier.
    The way that category works is that each non-English speaking country can submit a single film for consideration. Since "Passion of the Christ" was primarily an American film, there was no way that it could qualify, no matter what language was spoken.


    My pick for the biggest surprise in the nominations was "Shark Tale" getting a Best Animated Feature nomination over "The Polar Express".

    -Jeff
    "You're not a grown up! You're a Dad!" -ARG

    Visit my website for my photos and writing
    Read my grandmother and sister's poetry at Generations Poetry

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •