Andrew
02-08-2007, 11:18 AM
Mobile ESPN to be resurrected on Verizon (http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070208-8795.html) -- Ars Technica, 2007-02-08
A few short months after being euthanized (http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060928-7855.html), Mobile ESPN is about to be resurrected (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17044186/). This time around, it's going to be a channel on Verizon's V CAST video service rather than a full-fledged Mobile Virtual Network Operator (MVNO).
ESPN Mobile was originally launched in February 2006, with the sports network using Sprint Nextel's network to offer video clips, sports content, and cellular service brought to subscribers via ESPN-branded phones. The sports network had high hopes for the service. After all, there are millions of obsessive fantasy football and baseball players hungering for the latest stats and and information on their favorite players.
Unfortunately for ESPN, the legion of sports (and ESPN) fans failed to translate into subscribers. Perhaps it was the relatively high cost: getting highlights streamed to your phone cost a minimum of $14.99 per month in addition to what subscribers had to pay for basic calling plans. Whatever the reason, the heavy promotion on ESPN and a commercial that ran during Super Bowl XL was reportedly only able to attract around 30,000 subscribers.
A few short months after being euthanized (http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060928-7855.html), Mobile ESPN is about to be resurrected (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17044186/). This time around, it's going to be a channel on Verizon's V CAST video service rather than a full-fledged Mobile Virtual Network Operator (MVNO).
ESPN Mobile was originally launched in February 2006, with the sports network using Sprint Nextel's network to offer video clips, sports content, and cellular service brought to subscribers via ESPN-branded phones. The sports network had high hopes for the service. After all, there are millions of obsessive fantasy football and baseball players hungering for the latest stats and and information on their favorite players.
Unfortunately for ESPN, the legion of sports (and ESPN) fans failed to translate into subscribers. Perhaps it was the relatively high cost: getting highlights streamed to your phone cost a minimum of $14.99 per month in addition to what subscribers had to pay for basic calling plans. Whatever the reason, the heavy promotion on ESPN and a commercial that ran during Super Bowl XL was reportedly only able to attract around 30,000 subscribers.