DBJ
04-15-2002, 12:00 PM
I became a Universal Studios season pass holder for the first time this year. While walking through the park and seeing how little of it is changing from year to year, I am wondering if USH has any plans to stay competitve with new attractions.
First, the plus side of Universal. The upper lot is themed extremely well. You do get the sense of wonder/euphoria as you enter the park. The shows are also pretty good.
Now the negatives that stick out. While the shows are good, they really will not hold up to repeat viewings, especially if you plan to go once a month like the other theme parks.
So here are my suggestions, based on what has been done at USF, Warner Brothers Movie World, and the Disney parks.
First, add some thrill rides. Thrill rides, whether they be for the little ones or for the big ones, actually can be enjoyed repeatedly even on the same visit. I am not sure anyone would sit through four viewings of Animal Planet Live back to back, despite it being very good.
Looking at Tokyo DisneySea, they had a clever idea in putting thirll rides for little ones indoors to protect against whether. USH could do the same thing and convert soundstage space, say behind ET for example, and add in quite a few thrill rides for the kids. Wouldn't most of the Snoopy rides or SFMM Looney Tune rides actually fit into a soundstage?
Of course, the obvious advantage for building thrill rides indoors would not be for the weather, but for to sheild the rest of the studio and or neighbors from noise.
Keeping with the noise blocking theme, a coaster would not immediately be thought of as easy to build. But, as Disney has proven with both Space Mountian and Rock n Roller, both a traditional steel coaster and an invert coaster can be built indoors and still be excellent rides. Even the old Beetlejuice stage which is vacant can play host to a wild mouse design or even a flying coaster on a smaller scale like Zamperla's Volare, currently under construction at SF in Denver.
On the tram tour, they refer to one of the stages as haunted. Makes you wonder why they just don't build a "haunted" set for the tram to travel it's way through?
Or, why on Back To The Future, they don't film new segments for the trips through time? They don't even have to change the part with the live actors!
Could Doctor Doom's Tower by put inside or on one side of the Jurrasic Park building? Maybe not the exact same ride, but an Intamin drop ride?
I just can't help but thinking if they were a little more creative and expanded the parks to include more soundstage space to hide some rides that can hold up to repeat viewings, that the park would be quite a bit more entertaining for frequent visits.
First, the plus side of Universal. The upper lot is themed extremely well. You do get the sense of wonder/euphoria as you enter the park. The shows are also pretty good.
Now the negatives that stick out. While the shows are good, they really will not hold up to repeat viewings, especially if you plan to go once a month like the other theme parks.
So here are my suggestions, based on what has been done at USF, Warner Brothers Movie World, and the Disney parks.
First, add some thrill rides. Thrill rides, whether they be for the little ones or for the big ones, actually can be enjoyed repeatedly even on the same visit. I am not sure anyone would sit through four viewings of Animal Planet Live back to back, despite it being very good.
Looking at Tokyo DisneySea, they had a clever idea in putting thirll rides for little ones indoors to protect against whether. USH could do the same thing and convert soundstage space, say behind ET for example, and add in quite a few thrill rides for the kids. Wouldn't most of the Snoopy rides or SFMM Looney Tune rides actually fit into a soundstage?
Of course, the obvious advantage for building thrill rides indoors would not be for the weather, but for to sheild the rest of the studio and or neighbors from noise.
Keeping with the noise blocking theme, a coaster would not immediately be thought of as easy to build. But, as Disney has proven with both Space Mountian and Rock n Roller, both a traditional steel coaster and an invert coaster can be built indoors and still be excellent rides. Even the old Beetlejuice stage which is vacant can play host to a wild mouse design or even a flying coaster on a smaller scale like Zamperla's Volare, currently under construction at SF in Denver.
On the tram tour, they refer to one of the stages as haunted. Makes you wonder why they just don't build a "haunted" set for the tram to travel it's way through?
Or, why on Back To The Future, they don't film new segments for the trips through time? They don't even have to change the part with the live actors!
Could Doctor Doom's Tower by put inside or on one side of the Jurrasic Park building? Maybe not the exact same ride, but an Intamin drop ride?
I just can't help but thinking if they were a little more creative and expanded the parks to include more soundstage space to hide some rides that can hold up to repeat viewings, that the park would be quite a bit more entertaining for frequent visits.